PERSPEKTIFNUSANTARA.COM– In many societies, helping family members or close friends is often seen as a natural and admirable act. However, when personal relationships become the main reason someone receives a job, promotion, scholarship, or leadership position, the issue becomes more complex. Nepotism has gradually become a normalized culture that threatens the principle of fairness. While it may create opportunities for a few individuals, it often limits opportunities for others who may be more qualified but lack the right connections.
Supporters of nepotism argue that trust is an important factor in decision-making. They believe that relatives or close acquaintances are more reliable because they are already familiar with the values and expectations of an organization. Although this argument may seem reasonable, competence should never be sacrificed for convenience. According to the OECD, merit-based recruitment is essential because positions should be filled based on skills, experience, and qualifications rather than personal connections. The organization also notes that favoritism and nepotism can weaken transparency and undermine the integrity of institutions.
One of the most concerning effects of nepotism is its impact on motivation. Many talented individuals spend years developing their abilities and working hard to achieve their goals. Yet when opportunities are repeatedly given to those with personal connections, people may begin to question whether effort truly matters. This perception can discourage individuals from striving for excellence and create a culture where success appears to depend more on what a person can do.
The consequence extend beyond individual disappointment. Research published by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) highlights that merit-based recruitment contributes to public trust, employee motivation, and even economic development. In contrast, systems that prioritize connections over competence may reduce institutional effectiveness and public confidence. When qualified individuals are overlooked, organizations risk losing valuable talent and innovative ideas that could contribute to their growth.
Of course, helping family members is not inherently wrong. Offering advice, guidance, or support is part of human relationships. The problem arises when personal loyalty overrides fairness and transparency. There is a significant difference between encouraging someone to succeed and giving them advantages that others do not have access to. A fair system should allow everyone to compete under the same standards regardless of their background or connections.
Nepotism should not be accepted as a normal practice. Opportunities should be based on merit, not on personal relationships. A society that values competence and transparency is more likely to earn public trust, promote motivation, and create equal opportunities for its members. Success should be determined by ability and hard work, not by the privilege of knowing the right people.
Baca juga: Menjadi Ethical Gatekeeper: Menghidupkan Kembali Peran Guru di Era AI ala Ramir S. Austria
