Cancel Culture in the Digital Era: An Effort to Enforce Accountability or a Form of Public Judgment?

"Public pressure through social media has, at times, successfully encouraged apologies or policy changes. From this perspective, cancel culture can function as a form of social control that promotes accountability".
Penulis, Mahasiswa Tingkat IV Prodi Bahasa Inggris Unika Santo Paulus Ruteng.

PERSPEKTIFNUSANTARA.COM– Technological advancements and the rise of social media have transformed the way people express opinions and evaluate the actions of others. In the past, criticism was mainly conveyed through traditional media. Today, however, every individual has the opportunity to voice their views directly through digital platforms. This shift has given rise to a phenomenon known as cancel culture.

In general, cancel culture refers to collective actions taken by society to withdraw support from individuals or groups perceived to have committed moral or social violations. These actions may take various forms, including boycotts, the withdrawal of financial support, and campaigns encouraging people to unfollow certain social media accounts.

This phenomenon has grown alongside increasing public awareness of social justice issues. In some cases, cancel culture is seen as a tool for demanding accountability from public figures or institutions when formal systems are considered ineffective in delivering consequences.

Baca juga: Membangun Sekolah Ramah Anak untuk Mengatasi Maraknya Perundungan: Menyelamatkan Masa Depan Generasi Bangsa

Public pressure through social media has, at times, successfully encouraged apologies or policy changes. From this perspective, cancel culture can function as a form of social control that promotes accountability.

However, the phenomenon also raises several ethical concerns. One of the main criticisms of cancel culture is its tendency to judge individuals quickly without a fair process. Unverified information often spreads faster than clarifications, causing public opinion to form before all the facts are fully known.

Additionally, social media algorithms tend to promote content that triggers strong emotions, such as anger. As a result, people may react impulsively rather than verify information. Under these circumstances, cancel culture risks evolving into mass public judgment.

Baca juga: Menjadi Ethical Gatekeeper: Menghidupkan Kembali Peran Guru di Era AI ala Ramir S. Austria

This phenomenon may also overlook the possibility of personal growth and change. Mistakes made in the past are often used continuously to judge individuals without considering how they may have developed over time.

Halaman: 12

CATATAN REDAKSI:

Apabila terdapat pihak yang merasa dirugikan dan/atau keberatan atas penayangan artikel dan/atau berita di atas, dapat mengajukan sanggahan dan/atau koreksi kepada Redaksi kami. Koreksi tersebut dapat disampaikan sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 1 ayat (11) dan (12) Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 1999 tentang Pers.

Berita Terkait

Berita Terbaru